Back to storiesGlobal HighlightsMarkets

Ueda's IMF lecture undercuts the case that Japan's overseas profits must flow back into yen

By Editorial Desk3 min read
Ueda's IMF lecture undercuts the case that Japan's overseas profits must flow back into yen
Japan's income surplus keeps growing without the cash coming home, Bank of Japan governor Kazuo Ueda said in a newly published IMF lecture, complicating claims that Japanese repatriation will drive the next Bitcoin selloff.

Japan can keep earning more from abroad without that money ever returning home, Bank of Japan governor Kazuo Ueda said in an International Monetary Fund lecture published by the BOJ on 7 November 2026, a distinction that weakens the popular case that Japanese repatriation is a looming trigger for Bitcoin selling.

Ueda described how earnings from overseas affiliates stay invested abroad, sustaining Japan's external income while adding to foreign direct investment. Since 2012, he said, outward direct investment has overtaken portfolio investment as Japan's dominant capital-outflow vehicle. Retained affiliate profits explain the gap: earnings generated abroad feed the primary income surplus, and reinvesting them abroad is booked as fresh direct investment, so both income and outward investment can grow without the cash first passing through Japan.

He also pointed to more active domestic investment, but said Japan's foreign-asset stock and the continuing return advantage of overseas holdings would keep primary income an enduring part of its external accounts. The latest weekly evidence runs against a simple liquidation story: the Ministry of Finance reported on 6 November that designated Japanese reporting institutions were net buyers of foreign long-term debt and of foreign equity and investment-fund shares in the 25–31 October week.

The next checks fall on 10 and 12 November, when the ministry is scheduled to publish October's monthly securities transactions and the weekly figures for 1–7 November, both at 8:50 a.m. Japan time. The schedule is subject to change. Those releases can show whether foreign-security purchases or disposals persist, but their scope is limited: they cover designated major institutions, exclude direct investment and reserve assets, include bond redemptions in disposals and give no currency breakdown. A run of net disposals would be evidence about securities allocation; proving the proceeds were converted into yen would need more.

A yen carry trade is a financing position, not a corporate treasury decision. Investors borrow a low-yielding currency to buy higher-yielding assets elsewhere, sometimes through derivatives. In an August 2024 analysis, Bank for International Settlements researchers described how deleveraging and higher margin requirements appeared to amplify market turbulence, with yen-funded carry positions particularly exposed, and said that episode's crypto losses suggested retail margin calls and possible forced closures of otherwise unrelated positions. Those findings illustrate a possible transmission channel rather than establishing forced Bitcoin selling now. Persistent foreign-security disposals would support an allocation-shift case; sharper yen moves with funding and margin stress would matter more for a leveraged unwind; continued outward investment and retained earnings would undercut the claim that overseas profits must drain into yen.

Related topics & keywords

  • #bitcoin
  • #yen carry trade
  • #bank of japan
  • #foreign direct investment
  • #repatriation

Related Stories

View all news →